Write a bump email from a prospect's recent activity
Turns a prospect's recent post, comment, or company signal into a bump email that reacts with substance — a twist, a data point, a counterpoint — then bridges lightly back to your thread. It also scores whether the signal is strong enough to use, protecting you from the weak-signal bumps that read as stalking.
You are a personalization specialist who writes follow-up bumps from live prospect signals — a LinkedIn post they wrote, a comment they left, a podcast they appeared on, a company announcement, a job listing their team posted. Your standard is high: referencing activity only earns attention when you add a thought to it. 'Saw your post on hiring' is surveillance; 'your point about ramp time matches what we see in the data, with one twist' is a conversation. I'll give you the prospect's recent activity plus my original email context. Write me ONE bump email: - Under 80 words. - Open with a genuine reaction to their activity that adds something — an agreement with a twist, a supporting data point, a respectful counterpoint, a question their post raises. Never summary-as-flattery. - One bridge line connecting their topic to the thread I opened earlier — light-touch, no hard pivot into the pitch. - Soft CTA that continues the conversation their activity started, not mine. - Banned: 'I saw your post' as a standalone opener, 'great post!', restating their content back to them, congratulations with no substance, and any bridge so abrupt it exposes the email as a pretext. Also tell me: whether this particular activity is strong enough to bump from, scored 1 to 5 — and if it's a 2 or below, say so and tell me what signal to wait for instead. A weak-signal bump reads as stalking, not diligence. Before you write anything, interview me. Ask me these questions ONE AT A TIME, waiting for my answer each time: 1. Paste the activity — the post, comment, announcement, or listing, plus where it appeared and roughly when. 2. What did your original email to them say, and how long ago? 3. What do you sell, and what's the clearest outcome? 4. Do you have a genuine reaction to their content? Even half-formed — I'll sharpen it. Once you have my answers, score the signal and write the bump. If my reaction in question 4 is empty, build one from the content itself rather than faking enthusiasm.
How to use it
- 1
Copy the prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM.
- 2
Paste the activity verbatim at question 1 — the model reacts to their actual words, which is what makes the opener feel human.
- 3
Attempt your own reaction at question 4 even if rough; a sharpened version of your genuine thought beats a synthetic one.
- 4
Respect the signal score — if it says wait, wait. The next post is rarely far away.
- 5
Send within 48 hours of the activity; reacting to a three-week-old post undercuts the freshness that justifies the bump.
Best practices
Comments they wrote often outrank posts they shared as signals — original words reveal what they actually think about.
Disagreeing respectfully with one point outperforms agreement; a thoughtful counterpoint is rarer in their notifications than praise.
Wire this into your workflow: LinkedIn notifications for saved leads, or a Clay watch on your active-sequence prospects, so activity surfaces while it's fresh.
Cap activity-based bumps at one per prospect per sequence — a second one confirms you're monitoring them, which flips warm to creepy.
Example: what this looks like in practice
An SDR at a 12-person sales-enablement startup has an unanswered thread with a VP of Sales, three touches old. Her Clay watch flags that he just posted about ramping 5 new reps, arguing certifications are theater and shadowing is everything. She pastes the post and admits her half-formed reaction: shadowing works but doesn't scale past a few reps. The model scores the signal 5/5 and returns a 74-word bump: agrees on certification theater, adds the scaling twist with a stat from her customer base, bridges in one line to the thread, and asks how he plans to keep shadowing consistent across 5 reps at once. He replies with a paragraph — his first response after three silent touches.
Best fit
This prompt is one gear in a bigger machine. We orchestrate 20+ tools into outbound systems our clients own — and guarantee the results.
Apply for a Pilot Spot → →Frequently asked questions
Add a thought instead of proving you watched: react to a specific point with an agreement-plus-twist, a supporting data point, or a respectful counterpoint, the way you'd reply to a colleague's post. Creepiness comes from observation without contribution — 'saw your post' announces surveillance, while engaging with the idea reads as professional attention. Recency helps too: react within a day or two, not weeks later.
More follow-ups & sequences prompts
Build a complete 4-touch cold email sequence from scratch
Generates a launch-ready 4-touch sequence where each email plays a defined role — opener, proof, angle shift, close — with word caps, subject lines, and send delays included. The interview extracts your offer, segment, and proof first, so the sequence reads like one coherent argument instead of four disconnected pitches.
Write value-add bump emails that never say 'just following up'
Produces touch 2 and touch 3 bump emails that each introduce a new angle — proof, insight, or resource — instead of re-asking for attention. It bans every nagging cliché that kills reply rates and caps each touch at 75 words, so your follow-ups earn the reply the first email didn't get.
Ask for a referral in a follow-up without making it awkward
Produces a complete referral kit: a specific, well-timed ask email, a forwardable third-person blurb your contact can paste without writing anything, and a pressure-free bump. It engineers out the two reasons referral asks fail — vagueness and effort — and refuses to let you ask at a bad moment.