Write a connection request note (and decide if you should send one at all)
Settles the with-note or without-note question for your specific situation instead of applying a blanket rule, then writes two sub-280-character note variants with a real reason to connect and zero pitch. You get a defensible strategy call plus copy to test, not just another template.
You are a LinkedIn outbound strategist who has tested connection requests across tens of thousands of sends. You know the with-note versus without-note debate is not settled by dogma: blank requests often win when the sender's headline makes the relevance obvious, and notes win when the connection would otherwise look random. You also know what kills acceptance rates — pitching in the note, fake flattery, 'I'd love to add you to my network', and anything that smells like a sequence. Your job has two parts: PART 1 — THE CALL. Based on my answers, tell me whether I should send this request with a note or without one, and why, in 3–4 sentences. Consider my headline strength, how obviously relevant I am to this prospect, and their likely inbox volume. PART 2 — THE NOTE. Write the note version regardless, so I can test both: - Under 280 characters (LinkedIn caps at 300; leave headroom). - Reference one specific, true reason for connecting — shared context, their content, a mutual space — never a compliment with no substance. - Zero pitch. No mention of what I sell, no 'would love to chat', no calendar ask. - Write 2 variants with different angles. Before you write anything, interview me. Ask me these questions ONE AT A TIME, waiting for my answer each time: 1. What is your current LinkedIn headline, word for word? 2. Who is the prospect — role, company, and anything you know about them (recent post, job change, mutual connection)? 3. What is the genuine reason this connection makes sense from THEIR side? 4. What do you eventually want from this relationship? Once you have my answers, give me the call and both note variants. If my reason for connecting in question 3 is weak, say so and help me find a stronger one before writing.
How to use it
- 1
Copy the prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM.
- 2
Answer the four interview questions honestly — paste your actual headline for question 1, because the with/without call depends on it.
- 3
Send whichever version the model recommends to your next 20–30 requests and track acceptance rate.
- 4
Run the losing variant against a different segment before discarding it — note performance varies a lot by seniority.
Best practices
If the model says your headline is doing no work, fix the headline before sending anything — it lifts every request you send afterward.
Never combine the note with a pitch in the first DM after acceptance; the note earns the connection, nothing more.
Track acceptance rate by segment (role, industry) in a simple sheet — the with/without answer often differs between VPs and practitioners.
Requests referencing a prospect's own post consistently outperform ones referencing their company.
Example: what this looks like in practice
A founder of a 6-person RevOps consultancy targets Heads of Sales Ops at Series B SaaS companies. Her headline reads 'Helping B2B teams fix their CRM chaos', so the model calls it: send without a note to ops leaders who will get the relevance instantly, but use a note for the CEOs on her list where the connection looks random. It writes two notes, one referencing a prospect's post about Salesforce hygiene, one referencing a shared community. Her acceptance rate on the noted CEO segment goes from 22% to 41% over the next 50 sends.
Best fit
This prompt is one gear in a bigger machine. We orchestrate 20+ tools into outbound systems our clients own — and guarantee the results.
Apply for a Pilot Spot → →Frequently asked questions
There is no universal answer, which is why this prompt makes the call case by case. Blank requests tend to win when your headline instantly explains your relevance to that prospect. Notes win when the connection would otherwise look random or when you have one genuinely specific hook, like their recent post. Test both against your own list — acceptance data beats dogma.
More linkedin & social selling prompts
Build a 3-touch LinkedIn DM sequence that escalates without annoying
Designs a complete 3-touch DM sequence where each message earns its place: a trigger-based opener, a value-led middle touch that isn't a bump, and a graceful close with no guilt-trip. Includes the psychology behind each touch and adapts wording to manual sending or tools like HeyReach.
Build a 4-week LinkedIn content calendar for sellers
Produces a realistic 4-week posting calendar for someone whose job is selling, not content: a repeatable format mix matched to what you actually know, day-by-day briefs so no post starts from blank, a pillar map that keeps everything commercially pointed, and a batching plan that produces a week's posts in one sitting.
Build a Sales Navigator search strategy for your ICP
Designs a layered Sales Navigator system instead of a one-off search: account filters with the miscategorization traps flagged, persona searches with paste-ready boolean strings, a signal layer that surfaces who to message this month, saved-search alerts, and a QA protocol. Built from your real customers, not an aspirational ICP doc.