Evaluate partnership and channel strategy before you commit
Screens every partner motion against your actual deal economics, ranks partner archetypes by their selfish reason to refer you, models honest first-year numbers including the partners who never activate, and designs a 90-day named-partner pilot — with a direct-outbound comparison so partnerships compete for resources on evidence, not hope.
You are a partnerships strategist who has built and, more often, unwound channel programs at B2B companies. You've seen the pattern: five signed MOUs, one joint webinar, and eighteen months later not a single partner-sourced deal. Your rule: a partnership is a real strategy only when the partner has a selfish, recurring reason to send you business — everything else is a logo swap. Evaluate partnership and channel strategy for my business: 1. Motion fit screen: given my deal size, sales cycle, and margins, which partner motions are even viable — referral partners, resellers, technology integrations, service providers who implement or recommend, marketplaces — and which are structurally wrong for my economics. Show the math. 2. Partner archetype ranking: the 2-3 specific partner types most likely to produce pipeline for me, with the selfish reason each would consistently refer — not the reason I wish they had. 3. Economics per motion: for the top archetype, model a realistic first year — partners recruited, activation rate (be brutal: most recruited partners send nothing), deals per active partner, revenue share or margin cost, and my cost of managing it. 4. Pilot design: a 90-day pilot with 3-5 hand-picked partners, the activation plan for each, and the numbers that distinguish 'scale this' from 'quietly stop'. 5. The honest alternative: what the same effort invested in direct outbound would likely produce, so I'm choosing partnerships on evidence rather than novelty. Avoid: partner strategies that depend on partners' goodwill instead of their self-interest, launching a program before piloting with named partners, and counting signed agreements as progress. Before you write anything, interview me. Ask me these questions ONE AT A TIME, waiting for my answer each time: 1. What do you sell, at what price point and margin, and how do customers buy it today? 2. Who already touches your customers before or while they need you — what tools, services, or advisors surround the purchase? 3. Have any deals ever come through partners or referrals? What actually happened? 4. What can you offer a partner — revenue share, leads back, product value, co-marketing muscle? 5. How much time and money can you actually dedicate to this for two quarters? Once you have my answers, run the evaluation. If my economics don't support any partner motion yet, say so plainly and tell me what would have to change first.
How to use it
- 1
Copy the prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM.
- 2
For question 2, map the buyer's surrounding ecosystem — their accountant, their agency of record, their software stack — before answering.
- 3
Take the activation-rate assumptions seriously; they're the number everyone inflates.
- 4
Hand-pick pilot partners you already know rather than recruiting strangers to a program that doesn't exist yet.
- 5
Compare the pilot's 90-day results against the direct-outbound alternative before scaling anything.
Best practices
The best partners already talk to your buyer at the moment of need — implementation firms, adjacent tools, industry advisors.
One activated partner beats ten signed agreements; measure partner-sourced meetings, never MOU count.
Make the first referral effortless: give partners the exact intro email, the one-liner, and a named human to hand off to.
Revenue share alone rarely motivates busy partners — leads flowing back to them, or making their core service stickier, works better.
Example: what this looks like in practice
A founder of a 12-person cybersecurity compliance service ($15K average engagement, 55% margin) is tempted by a reseller program after a conference. He answers the interview: customers usually find him during vendor security reviews, their MSPs and fractional CISOs are always in the room, and one MSP has informally sent three deals. The model kills the reseller idea on economics (margin can't fund reseller discount plus enablement), ranks MSPs first — their selfish reason: compliance gaps make their clients churn — and designs a pilot with five MSPs he already knows, each getting a co-branded gap-assessment offer and leads back from his own audits. Year-one model: five pilot partners, two truly active, eight deals. The pilot delivers six deals in a quarter, beating what the same hours in cold outbound produced.
Best fit
This prompt is one gear in a bigger machine. We orchestrate 20+ tools into outbound systems our clients own — and guarantee the results.
Apply for a Pilot Spot → →Frequently asked questions
Ask one question: what is the partner's selfish, recurring reason to send you business? Goodwill and revenue share alone rarely move busy partners — the reliable motivators are you solving a problem that makes their own customers stickier, or leads flowing back to them. If you can't articulate their self-interest in one sentence, the partnership will produce webinars, not pipeline.
More sales strategy & planning prompts
Build a quarterly outbound plan that survives contact with reality
Produces a complete quarterly outbound plan — pipeline math, prioritized segments, 3-5 concrete plays, a launch calendar, and named risks — grounded in your actual win rate and team capacity. The capacity check is the killer feature: it forces the plan to admit when the math doesn't close instead of papering over it with optimism.
Design an irresistible B2B offer with the value equation
Applies the value equation to your actual B2B offer instead of leaving it as a book concept. You get a blunt scoring of your current offer, three rebuilt variants with guarantees your margins can survive, the operational cost of each, and a small validation test — turning 'our offer is fine' into an engineering exercise.
Build a 13-week outbound campaign calendar for the quarter
Turns a pile of campaign ideas into a staggered 13-week execution calendar with owners, prep time scheduled before launches, standing review rhythms, and kill criteria at week 7. It prevents the classic quarter shape — frantic week-1 launches, silent middle, panicked final push — by design rather than discipline.