Design an irresistible B2B offer with the value equation
Applies the value equation to your actual B2B offer instead of leaving it as a book concept. You get a blunt scoring of your current offer, three rebuilt variants with guarantees your margins can survive, the operational cost of each, and a small validation test — turning 'our offer is fine' into an engineering exercise.
You are an offer strategist who has applied Alex Hormozi's value equation — dream outcome times perceived likelihood of achievement, divided by time delay times effort and sacrifice — to B2B services and software offers, not gym launches. You know B2B buyers don't respond to hype; they respond to risk removal, speed, and specificity. A great B2B offer makes the buyer feel stupid saying no because the downside has been engineered out. Redesign my offer: 1. Score my current offer 1-10 on each of the four value equation levers, with one blunt sentence per score explaining the buyer's perspective. 2. Produce three redesigned offer variants — conservative, aggressive, and 'grand slam' — each specifying: the named outcome and timeframe, the guarantee or risk reversal, what's done-for-you versus done-with-you, pricing structure, and a one-sentence version for a cold email. 3. For each variant, state what it costs me operationally and what could go wrong (guarantee abuse, margin compression, fulfillment strain). 4. Recommend one variant and the smallest test to validate it before rolling it out everywhere. Avoid: guarantees I can't survive, discounting disguised as offer design, outcome claims my delivery can't back, and 'money-back guarantee' as the lazy default when a performance-based or milestone-based structure fits better. Before you write anything, interview me. Ask me these questions ONE AT A TIME, waiting for my answer each time: 1. What do you sell today — deliverables, pricing, contract terms — and to whom? 2. What measurable outcome do your best clients actually get, and how fast? 3. What percentage of clients get a great result versus a mediocre one, and what separates them? 4. What makes prospects hesitate or say no most often? 5. What are your margins and delivery capacity — how much risk reversal can you actually afford? Once you have my answers, run the analysis. If my delivery data can't support any honest guarantee, say so and design the offer around speed and effort reduction instead.
How to use it
- 1
Copy the prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM.
- 2
Answer question 3 honestly — the gap between your best and average client results determines what guarantee is survivable.
- 3
Pay attention to the operational cost section; the grand slam variant is usually right for a new motion, wrong for a strained team.
- 4
Run the recommended validation test on 50-100 cold prospects before changing your website.
- 5
Feed the winning one-sentence version into your cold email prompts as the new CTA.
Best practices
Anchor guarantees to milestones you control ('20 qualified meetings in 90 days or we work free') rather than outcomes the client controls (their close rate).
If prospects hesitate on trust, work the 'perceived likelihood' lever with proof and guarantees; if they hesitate on bandwidth, work the 'effort' lever with done-for-you scope.
Test the offer in cold outreach before redesigning pricing pages — reply rates are the fastest offer feedback loop that exists.
Revisit quarterly: an offer that was differentiated in January is table stakes by summer in competitive markets.
Example: what this looks like in practice
A founder of a 6-person RevOps consultancy sells $8K/month retainers with 3-month minimums and keeps losing deals to 'let me think about it'. He answers the interview: best clients cut their CRM admin time 60% within six weeks, about 70% of clients hit that, and hesitation is always risk ('what if it doesn't work for our stack?'). The model scores his current offer 3/10 on perceived likelihood and 4/10 on time delay, then produces variants. The recommended one: a fixed-scope '6-week CRM overhaul' at $12K with a milestone guarantee — audit delivered in week 1 or full refund, measurable admin-time reduction by week 6 or the retainer's first month free. Cold outreach test on 80 prospects: replies triple against the old retainer pitch.
Best fit
This prompt is one gear in a bigger machine. We orchestrate 20+ tools into outbound systems our clients own — and guarantee the results.
Apply for a Pilot Spot → →Frequently asked questions
The four levers translate directly: dream outcome becomes a measurable business result with a number attached, perceived likelihood becomes proof and guarantees, time delay becomes speed-to-value milestones, and effort becomes how much you do for the client versus with them. B2B buyers weight perceived likelihood heaviest because they're risking their reputation internally — which is why this prompt pushes hardest on risk reversal.
More sales strategy & planning prompts
Build a quarterly outbound plan that survives contact with reality
Produces a complete quarterly outbound plan — pipeline math, prioritized segments, 3-5 concrete plays, a launch calendar, and named risks — grounded in your actual win rate and team capacity. The capacity check is the killer feature: it forces the plan to admit when the math doesn't close instead of papering over it with optimism.
Build a 13-week outbound campaign calendar for the quarter
Turns a pile of campaign ideas into a staggered 13-week execution calendar with owners, prep time scheduled before launches, standing review rhythms, and kill criteria at week 7. It prevents the classic quarter shape — frantic week-1 launches, silent middle, panicked final push — by design rather than discipline.
Build a competitive strategy against a dominant incumbent
Produces an asymmetric competitive strategy: a map of where the incumbent structurally can't compete, the one wedge segment to own, a reframing question that tilts evaluations your way, and an objection playbook for the 'nobody got fired for buying them' conversation. It stops you from fighting a bigger army on its chosen ground.